Follow Us
Academic writing has two hard parts: doing the thinking, and turning that thinking into clear pages. Budget AI tools can help with the second part, and speed up the first part if you use them like assistants, not ghostwriters.
One important note before we get into the list: many universities and publishers now expect responsible use. Some require disclosure; some allow AI for editing but not for generating whole sections. A simple rule that keeps you safe is: use AI to improve your work, not replace your work.
A tool is budget-friendly if it gives you one (or more) of these:
A genuinely useful free plan
A low-cost monthly plan you can cancel anytime
Clear value for academic work (citations, PDFs, summaries, structure)
| Tool | Best for | Free plan? | Paid plan starts at | Why it’s worth it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elicit | Literature review + paper extraction | Yes | $10/month | Fast paper discovery + structured evidence tables |
| SciSpace | Reading papers + “chat with PDF” workflows | Yes (limited) | From ~$8/month | Helps you understand papers without drowning |
| Perplexity | Research with citations you can verify | Yes | $20/month | Answers + sources you can open and check |
| QuillBot | Paraphrasing + clarity edits | Yes (limited) | $8.33/month (annual) | Useful for rewriting your own text cleanly |
| Grammarly (Pro) | Final polish: grammar + tone + clarity | Yes | $12/month (annual avg) | Great for last-mile quality control |
If you’ve ever wasted hours clicking random papers, Elicit fixes that. It’s built for research workflows: finding papers, summarizing, and extracting key details into tables.
Use it for
Finding relevant papers faster
Building a mini literature review table (method, sample size, results, limitations)
Pulling out data points for comparison
Budget angle
Elicit offers a free Basic plan and a Plus plan at $10/month.
Pro tip
Create a table with columns like: Research question, Dataset/participants, Method, Key result, Limitation, What I will cite. That last column keeps you honest.
SciSpace shines when you’re staring at a dense PDF and thinking, what is this even saying? It’s positioned as an AI research agent with tools like “chat with PDF,” literature review flows, and writing support.
Use it for
Breaking down a paper section-by-section
Asking “what does this equation/paragraph mean?”
Extracting definitions and assumptions
Turning a long method section into bullet steps (for your notes)
Budget angle
SciSpace pricing shows plans starting around $8/month, depending on the product tier.
Pro tip
Ask it to generate: “3-sentence summary + 5 limitations + what I should cite directly from the paper.” Then you still verify the exact lines in the PDF.
For academic writing, “answers” are useless unless you can verify them. Perplexity is helpful because it emphasizes citations and source-linked answers, which makes it easier to validate claims.
Use it for
Quick background research with sources
Finding authoritative pages and papers
Getting alternative viewpoints and counterarguments
Making a first draft of your bibliography candidates (you still format properly)
Budget angle
Pro is listed at $20/month (and a yearly option).
Pro tip
Use it to find sources, not to “be the source.” If you can’t open and read the cited material, don’t cite it.
QuillBot is basically a rewriting toolset (paraphrasing, grammar, etc.). It’s useful when your draft is correct but clunky.
Use it for
Making sentences clearer and less repetitive
Tightening long paragraphs
Rewriting a section in a more formal academic tone (based on your content)
Budget angle
Premium is listed at $19.95 monthly, with cheaper annual pricing (e.g., $8.33/month billed annually).
Pro tip
Never feed it an entire assignment and accept the output. Rewrite paragraph-by-paragraph, and keep your voice and logic intact.
Grammarly is strongest at the last step: grammar, clarity, tone, and flow. It’s the tool you run once your content and citations are already correct. Grammarly’s current pricing/help pages list annual pricing at $12/month average.
(Heads-up: Grammarly has also been rolling into a larger “Superhuman” suite in recent announcements, so the product positioning is evolving.)
Use it for
Grammar + punctuation checks
Clarity improvements
Consistency in formal tone
Cutting wordiness
Budget angle
Free plan covers basics; Pro is the upgrade when you’re submitting serious writing.
Pro tip
Don’t accept every suggestion. In academic writing, “clear” can accidentally become “less precise.”
If you want to stay on the right side of academic integrity:
Research: Perplexity → collect sources and save links
Reading: SciSpace → understand PDFs and extract notes
Evidence table: Elicit → organize studies + compare results
Draft: you write the first version (using your outline + evidence)
Edit: QuillBot (light rewrite) + Grammarly (final polish)
Many institutions recommend clarifying permission and documenting AI use when it affects scholarly writing, and publishers increasingly ask for transparency.
Start with free plans. Upgrade only when a deadline hits.
Choose monthly for one-off submissions; choose annual only if you’ll use it all semester.
Don’t subscribe to overlapping tools. One research tool + one editing tool is usually enough.
CTA: Pick 2 tools for 30 days: one for research (Elicit or Perplexity) and one for writing polish (Grammarly or QuillBot). That alone can cut your workload without blowing your budget.
Often yes, but it depends on your institution and course policy. Many guidelines emphasize transparency and permission for certain uses.
Elicit is designed for research workflows like finding papers and extracting structured evidence.
Perplexity is useful because it emphasizes cited answers you can verify.
It’s fine for rewriting your own text for clarity. The risk is using it to disguise copied work or submitting AI-generated text as your own.
No. Even Turnitin notes AI writing detection is designed to help identify text that might be AI-generated, and institutions vary in how they use it.
